Choosing Names
One Entity One Name
To pursue scientific work internationally, everyone, irrespective of their language, must use just one name for each entity. Discussion and development of knowledge is exceedingly difficult without a 1:1 correspondence between a name & an entity (or thing).
Naming can take two forms:
- a formula (or index name) for universal-international use and for scientific purposes
- a natural language name for everyday use (= formal-name or THEE-Name)
TOP has adopted a formula system using symbols as names; and has proposed formal names to ease discussion. A Glossary and Formularyare currently under development.
The formula is constructed so as to specify the precise location of an entity within the taxonomic structure.
If we do not know what psychosocial phenomenon a particular cell or hierarchy in THEE refers to, we cannot refer to it with a natural language name. However, we can still specify the formula for that cell. You can see some formulae and names here.
Every part of the formula is meaningful and gives inquirers guidance as to the likely properties and relationships of an actual psychosocial entity. So THEE is similar to the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements. A set of rules for constructing THEE formulae has been developed: see current version.
Reality is Messy
A name captures a useful category or class containing examples (or instances), so:
- Naming = categorizing or classifying; and
- Specific items in the world are examples/instances of the name/category.
A category is necessarily clear and pure, while any thing in the social world is multidimensional and messy. As a result, there is never a full correspondence between the name-category-properties and the particular instance.
- Read more about getting names right, using natural language and using formulae.
-
Confused? Get comfortable with «naming» by reviewing the naming of physical things.
Originally posted: August 2009; last updated 16 January 2011.